Far-right fossil fuel company allies pressure US supreme court to shield firms in unprecedented campaign

Trending 1 week ago

Far-right fossil substance friends person launched a stunning and unprecedented run pressuring nan ultimate tribunal to shield fossil substance companies from litigation that could costs them billions of dollars.

Some of nan groups down nan run person ties to Leonard Leo, nan architect of nan rightwing takeover of nan ultimate court who helped prime Trump’s ultimate tribunal nominees. Leo besides appears to person ties to Chevron, 1 of nan plaintiffs successful nan lawsuit.

“He’s really crafted nan ultimate court,” said Lisa Graves, executive head of nan progressive watchdog group True North Research and an master connected Leonard Leo’s network.

Honolulu is 1 of 40 cities and states suing large lipid for an alleged decades-long effort to sow uncertainty astir nan dangers of burning fossils. If successful, nan lawsuit could unit nan defendants to salary for ambiance damages.

In October, nan Hawaii ultimate tribunal ruled that nan suit tin spell to trial. But lipid companies petitioned nan US ultimate tribunal successful February to reappraisal nan authorities court’s decision; they based on nan cases should beryllium thrown retired because emissions are a national rumor that shouldn’t beryllium tried successful authorities courts.

Supreme tribunal justices met connected Thursday to see whether aliases not to return up nan fossil substance companies’ request, and nan justices could assistance aliases cull nan petition successful nan coming days.

If granted, nan petition could catalyze nan dismissal of nan activity of ambiance accountability lawsuits against large lipid – a awesome triumph for nan defendants seeking to limit their liability for nan ambiance crisis. But it’s nan benignant of inquire astir which nan ultimate tribunal would not usually connection its opinion, advocates and ineligible experts say.

“The tribunal would astir apt not deliberation this petition is important, unless personification told them it was very important,” said Kert Davies, a head astatine nan Center for Climate Integrity, which supports nan litigation against large oil.

Some conservatives person been telling them precisely that.

“I person never, ever seen this benignant of overt governmental run to power nan tribunal for illustration this,” said Patrick Parenteau, professor and elder ambiance argumentation chap astatine Vermont Law School.

In caller weeks, conservatives person published sentiment pieces successful Bloomberg, the Hill, the Wall Street Journal and nan National Review calling connected nan tribunal to assistance nan petition.

“Honolulu is attempting to usage nan rule of 1 authorities to predominate nan others,” wrote Carrie Severino, president of nan conservative acheronian money group JCN, formerly known arsenic nan Judicial Crisis Network, successful nan rightwing National Review.

JCN is simply a trade name for the Concord Fund, 1 of galore non-profits led by Leo, nan powerful far-right judicial activistic who besides co-chairs nan rightwing ineligible defense group nan Federalist Society. Justice Clarence Thomas once quipped that Leo was nan 3rd astir powerful personification successful nan world.

Asked astir nan power campaign, Severino told nan Guardian: “Liberal acheronian money groups … are freaking retired because nan ultimate tribunal is being asked to measurement successful and correct nan harm those acheronian money groups are doing pinch their monolithic run to subvert nan rule and nan constitution pinch a extremist ambiance agenda.”

Another Leo-tied non-profit, nan Alliance for Consumers, has besides been moving social media ads making akin arguments, Rolling Stone reported this month. Leo has said he will effort to usage nan non-profit to “institute a batch of ineligible and societal change”.

In April, 20 Republican authorities attorneys wide besides revenge “friend of nan court” briefs asking nan ultimate tribunal to assistance nan petition. Each of them are members of nan Republican Attorneys General Association, to which Leo’s Concord Fund is simply a awesome contributor.

The sentiment pieces successful nan Hill were authored by Donald Kochan, a professor astatine George Mason University rule school, which successful 2016 received a $30m aid brokered by Leo, E&E News noted.

Two older men successful suits shingle hands.
Leonard Leo, left, welcomes ultimate tribunal justness Neil Gorsuch for a reside astatine nan Federalist Society connected 16 November 2017. Photograph: Sait Serkan Gurbuz/AP

George Mason University has besides taken tens of millions of dollars from rightwing organizations cultivated by fossil substance billionaire Charles Koch. A strategist astatine 1 Koch group said successful 2022 that her statement is “partnering pinch organizations that tin get nan correct cases to nan ultimate court”, nan Guardian and Documented reported. The Koch web is besides a longtime awesome funder to nan Federalist Society, which Leo co-chairs.

Thousands of petitions are revenge pinch nan ultimate tribunal each year, each pinch only a mini chance of being reviewed, E&E News noted.

Federal rules besides say that nan ultimate court only has jurisdiction complete last judgments, Parenteau said.

“There is nary last judgement successful nan Honolulu case, play afloat stop,” said Parenteau. “For nan tribunal to assistance this petition, it would person to disregard aliases find immoderate measurement astir those clear procedural rules.”

Oil manufacture relationships

Some biology advocates are wondering if different Leo-tied group, CRC Advisors, has been progressive successful nan governmental campaign.

skip past newsletter promotion

The emailed remark nan Guardian obtained from Severino, nan president of JCN, quoted above, was sent not by JCN itself, but by a elder relationship executive astatine CRC Advisors.

Leo is nan laminitis and chair of nan nationalist relations firm, which reportedly useful pinch high-profile rightwing clients including nan Americans for Prosperity and nan Competitive Enterprise Institute – some portion of nan Koch network, which has agelong worked to sow ambiance doubt.

In 2020, E&E News revealed different evident CRC Advisors client: Chevron, which is 1 of nan defendants successful nan Honolulu suit and many different ambiance accountability cases. The patient mistakenly sent email to reporters ending pinch nan tagline: “If you would alternatively not person early communications from Chevron, fto america cognize by clicking here.”

An archived webpage recovered by True North Research besides shows that CRC listed nan “second-largest integrated power institution successful nan US” arsenic a customer successful 2019, saying that for nan client, nan agency “developed winning communications, media relations, situation communications and societal media strategies”.

The 2nd largest US power institution that twelvemonth was Chevron, noted Graves of True North Research.

CRC Advisors did not straight reside nan Guardian’s questions astir its engagement pinch nan run aliases its existent narration pinch Chevron.

Kert Davies said location is nary nonstop grounds that Chevron was progressive successful nan media push, but that nan run has raised suspicions.

“This Honolulu lawsuit straight impacts Chevron arsenic good arsenic galore different ambiance cases wherever Chevron is simply a defendant, truthful while we don’t yet cognize what firm interests are down nan Alliance for Consumers unit campaign, we support pursuing our noses,” he said.

Potential ‘backfiring’

The governmental campaign, said Graves, is simply a clear motion that nan US judiciary has been “captured by Leonard Leo and his billionaire benefactors”.

“These lawsuits are important measures to reside nan superior harms being caused by nan [fossil fuel] industry,” she said. “But … they person leveraged their resources successful bid to beforehand an schedule that does not let for ambiance accountability.”

But Parenteau said that nan nationalist strategy could “backfire”, because John Roberts, nan main justice, appears to beryllium “sincerely” concerned astir nan ultimate tribunal maintaining its integrity and reputation.

“I deliberation nan much that you politicize nan petition, I deliberation nan much you’re going to spot concern,” he said.

The justices person 3 options erstwhile it comes to nan lipid companies’ petition. If they assistance nan petition – nan worst imaginable result for nan lawsuits’ supporters – nan tribunal will perceive arguments successful nan fall. If nan justices alternatively inquire nan solicitor wide for an opinion, that would importantly hold nan case.

They could besides contradict nan petition outright, which would beryllium a triumph for ambiance advocates, said Parenteau.

“It’s 1 to watch closely” he said.

Another ambiance lawsuit, revenge by non-profit rule patient by a group of young group – will go to trial later this month.

Source theguardian